Comments on: Arab News slams China’s smothering of Taiwan’s participation in the World Health Organization http://regimewatch.blogivists.com/2008/05/12/arab-news-slams-chinas-smothering-of-taiwans-participation-in-the-world-health-organization/ These guys hosted the Olympics? Mon, 06 Oct 2008 22:08:23 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 By: mike http://regimewatch.blogivists.com/2008/05/12/arab-news-slams-chinas-smothering-of-taiwans-participation-in-the-world-health-organization/#comment-28 mike Wed, 14 May 2008 10:12:47 +0000 http://regimewatch.blogivists.com/2008/05/12/arab-news-slams-chinas-smothering-of-taiwans-participation-in-the-world-health-organization/#comment-28 Andrew, you are quite correct that there is more tension between Beijing and the Uighers in Xinjiang (or East Turkestan) than in Inner Mongolia. I will be posting on the oppression of the Uighers in Xinjiang in the near future. Thanks for taking the time to comment and keep coming back. Mike Andrew, you are quite correct that there is more tension between Beijing and the Uighers in Xinjiang (or East Turkestan) than in Inner Mongolia. I will be posting on the oppression of the Uighers in Xinjiang in the near future. Thanks for taking the time to comment and keep coming back.

Mike

]]> By: Andrew http://regimewatch.blogivists.com/2008/05/12/arab-news-slams-chinas-smothering-of-taiwans-participation-in-the-world-health-organization/#comment-27 Andrew Wed, 14 May 2008 00:47:48 +0000 http://regimewatch.blogivists.com/2008/05/12/arab-news-slams-chinas-smothering-of-taiwans-participation-in-the-world-health-organization/#comment-27 I am interested to see on your catergories links that this web site predictably has a link for Tibet but I was surprised to see one for Inner Mongolia which undoubtably has a lower profile than Tibet. But what really surprised me was that Inner Mongolia was included but East Turkestan (sorry forgot how to spell the Chinese name) and the Uighar cause was not mentioned. Can you explain the reason for this I thought there was more tension in East Turkestan than Inner Mongolia? I am interested to see on your catergories links that this web site predictably has a link for Tibet but I was surprised to see one for Inner Mongolia which undoubtably has a lower profile than Tibet. But what really surprised me was that Inner Mongolia was included but East Turkestan (sorry forgot how to spell the Chinese name) and the Uighar cause was not mentioned. Can you explain the reason for this I thought there was more tension in East Turkestan than Inner Mongolia?

]]>