<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Regime Watch &#187; Burma</title>
	<atom:link href="http://regimewatch.blogivists.com/category/burma/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://regimewatch.blogivists.com</link>
	<description>So many petty tyrants...so little time</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 17:17:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Beijing Helps Keep Burma&#8217;s Military Junta in Power</title>
		<link>http://regimewatch.blogivists.com/2008/05/29/beijing-helps-keep-the-thuggish-burmese-military-junta-in-power/</link>
		<comments>http://regimewatch.blogivists.com/2008/05/29/beijing-helps-keep-the-thuggish-burmese-military-junta-in-power/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 20:05:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Burma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Olympics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regimewatch.blogivists.com/2008/05/29/beijing-helps-keep-the-thuggish-burmese-military-junta-in-power/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Weeks after burma was devastated by a cyclone, the generals who run Burma&#8217;s military dictatorship have finally begun approving a few visas for foreign aid workers, while at the same time whining that the amazing generosity offered by countries around the world just isn&#8217;t enough (or, to read between the lines, not enough to adequately [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Weeks after burma was devastated by a cyclone, the generals who run Burma&#8217;s military dictatorship have finally begun approving a few <a href="http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2008/05/29/news/Myanmar.php">visas for foreign aid workers, while at the same time whining </a>that the amazing generosity offered by countries around the world just isn&#8217;t enough (or, to read between the lines, not enough to adequately line their own pockets while still pretending to care about their subjects).</p>
<p>From the associated Press:</p>
<blockquote><p>Myanmar&#8217;s ruling junta lashed out Thursday at aid donors who promised millions of dollars for cyclone relief, saying survivors didn&#8217;t need &#8220;bars of chocolate.&#8221;</p>
<p>State-run media criticized donors for only pledging up to $150 million — a far cry from the $11 billion the junta said it needed to rebuild.</p>
<p>The Myanma Ahlin newspaper, a government mouthpiece, said cyclone victims from the hardest-hit areas could get by without foreign handouts.</p>
<p>&#8220;People from the Irrawaddy delta can survive on their own, even without bars of chocolate donated by the international community,&#8221; it said, adding they can live on &#8220;fresh vegetables that grow wild in the fields and on protein-rich fish from the rivers.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Wow, the Burmese junta is a truly despicable regime.  But one dependent on the support of other regimes, especially from Communist China.  In a January 2008 report from the <a href="http://www.heritage.org/Research/WorldwideFreedom/bg2099.cfm">Washington, D.C. based Heritage Foundation, Steven Groves </a>notes:</p>
<blockquote><p>To repress a population of 47 million continually and successfully, the military junta must be well armed, and China is Burma&#8217;s primary arms supplier.  The junta&#8217;s violent crackdown on pro-democracy protesters in August 1988 caused international aid and development assistance to all but dry up. With limited revenues, the regime turned to China for the arms and armor that it needs  to sustain itself.  China, which cracked down on its own pro-democracy rally in Tiananmen Square in June 1989, readily agreed and has given the junta $2 billion to $3 billion in military aid since the early 1990s, helping the regime to expand its army from 180,000 to 450,000 soldiers.</p></blockquote>
<p>And yes, the regime in Beijing actually gets to host the Olympics.  Wonder if the Burmese generals will have box seats at the games?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://regimewatch.blogivists.com/2008/05/29/beijing-helps-keep-the-thuggish-burmese-military-junta-in-power/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hitchens on Beijing&#8217;s numerous client regimes and captive nations</title>
		<link>http://regimewatch.blogivists.com/2008/05/06/hitchens-on-beijings-numerous-client-regimes-and-captive-nations/</link>
		<comments>http://regimewatch.blogivists.com/2008/05/06/hitchens-on-beijings-numerous-client-regimes-and-captive-nations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 11:22:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Burma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Darfur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mugabe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Olympics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regimewatch.blogivists.com/2008/05/06/hitchens-on-beijings-numerous-client-regimes-and-captive-nations/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How do you even begin to summarize, in just a couple of paragraphs, the various thugocracies subsidized, or otherwise enabled by Communist China, or the sheer scope and breadth of the misery Beijing props up around the world?
If you are Christopher Hitchens, you do it something like this:
Those who care or purport to care about [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do you even begin to summarize, in just a couple of paragraphs, the various thugocracies subsidized, or otherwise enabled by Communist China, or the sheer scope and breadth of the misery Beijing props up around the world?</p>
<p>If you are Christopher Hitchens, you do it something <a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2175047/fr/flyout">like this</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Those who care or purport to care about human rights must start to discuss this problem in plain words. Is there an initiative to save the un-massacred remains of the people of Darfur? It will be met by a Chinese veto. Does anyone care about Robert Mugabe treating his desperate population as if it belonged to him personally? China is always ready to help him out. Are the North Koreans starved and isolated so that a demented playboy can posture with nuclear weapons? Beijing will give the demented playboy a guarantee. How long can Southeast Asia bear the shame and misery of the Burmese junta? As long as the embrace of China persists. The identity of Tibet is being obliterated by the deliberate importation of Chinese settlers. Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, a man who claims even to know and determine the sex lives of his serfs (by the way, the very essence of totalitarianism), is armed and financed by China. It was this way when President Bill Clinton wanted the United Nations to take on Slobodan Milosevic and was stymied (by China, among others), and it was this way when President Bush asked the United Nations to live up to its resolutions on Saddam Hussein. And now I hear human rights activists bleating about Burma and our inaction and simultaneously complaining about the only time that any U.S. president had the nerve to break the hold of China (and Russia, and sometimes France) on the possibility of any international rescue.</p>
<p>China also maintains territorial claims against India and Vietnam (and, of course, Taiwan) and is building a vast army, as well as a huge oceangoing navy, to back up these ambitions.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2175047/fr/flyout">There&#8217;s more. </a></p>
<p>Hitchens actually started out talking about Beijing&#8217;s cozy relationship with the vicious military dictatorship in Burma.  With the recent news that swaths of Burma have been <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/weather/storms/hurricanes/2008-05-05-burma-cyclone_N.htm">devastated by Cyclone Nargis</a>, the ineptitude of dictatorships in dealing with natural disasters (as opposed to their specialty of <a href="http://www.csmonitor.com/2007/1005/p01s02-woap.html">creating man-made disasters</a>) will sadly be on display to the world, and in fact may have already begun.</p>
<p>From yesterday&#8217;s <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/weather/storms/2008-05-05-burma_N.htm?csp=34">USA Today</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>U.S. and international aid groups scrambled Monday to send help to victims of what could be Asia&#8217;s worst natural disaster since the 2004 tsunami, but roads were closed in the low-lying delta region that was hardest hit.</p>
<p>First lady Laura Bush said the U.S. government had rushed $250,000 to aid organizations operating in Burma. However, she said further aid could be delayed because Burma&#8217;s government, one of the world&#8217;s most isolationist military regimes, has not yet agreed to allow a U.S. disaster response team into the country.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Maybe the junta in Burma is waiting for marching orders from Beijing first.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://regimewatch.blogivists.com/2008/05/06/hitchens-on-beijings-numerous-client-regimes-and-captive-nations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
