From Richard Gustafson at the University of Denver, here is an academic analysis of “China’s Growing Influence on the African Continent.” From the abstract:

Because of their colonial histories, African nations tend to be splintered, and conflicts on the continent are frequently internal. Following the Tienanmen Square incident in 1989 and the end of Cold War, the West’s financial support to Cold War allies diminished at the same time China shifted the focus of its foreign policy toward Africa. It offered aid and low interest loans with few or no conditions regarding governance or human rights. The continuous power struggles and efforts to maintain power make China’s overtures tempting to many African leaders. Many of China’s interactions come at the expense of the citizens of African nations and create a long-term detriment to economies on the African continent.

From the Aspen Times:

“I urge the Chinese government to release Tibetan political prisoners, account for Tibetans who have, quote, ‘disappeared’ since protests in March, and engage in meaningful dialogue on genuine autonomy for Tibet,” McCain said.

Nicely put, Senator.

If you are Christopher Hitchens, you do it something like this:

Those who care or purport to care about human rights must start to discuss this problem in plain words. Is there an initiative to save the un-massacred remains of the people of Darfur? It will be met by a Chinese veto. Does anyone care about Robert Mugabe treating his desperate population as if it belonged to him personally? China is always ready to help him out. Are the North Koreans starved and isolated so that a demented playboy can posture with nuclear weapons? Beijing will give the demented playboy a guarantee. How long can Southeast Asia bear the shame and misery of the Burmese junta? As long as the embrace of China persists. The identity of Tibet is being obliterated by the deliberate importation of Chinese settlers. Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, a man who claims even to know and determine the sex lives of his serfs (by the way, the very essence of totalitarianism), is armed and financed by China. It was this way when President Bill Clinton wanted the United Nations to take on Slobodan Milosevic and was stymied (by China, among others), and it was this way when President Bush asked the United Nations to live up to its resolutions on Saddam Hussein. And now I hear human rights activists bleating about Burma and our inaction and simultaneously complaining about the only time that any U.S. president had the nerve to break the hold of China (and Russia, and sometimes France) on the possibility of any international rescue.

China also maintains territorial claims against India and Vietnam (and, of course, Taiwan) and is building a vast army, as well as a huge oceangoing navy, to back up these ambitions.

There’s more.

Hitchens actually started out talking about Beijing’s cozy relationship with the vicious military dictatorship in Burma. With the recent news that swaths of Burma have been devastated by Cyclone Nargis, the ineptitude of dictatorships in dealing with natural disasters (as opposed to their specialty of creating man-made disasters) will sadly be on display to the world, and in fact may have already begun.

From yesterday’s USA Today:

U.S. and international aid groups scrambled Monday to send help to victims of what could be Asia’s worst natural disaster since the 2004 tsunami, but roads were closed in the low-lying delta region that was hardest hit.

First lady Laura Bush said the U.S. government had rushed $250,000 to aid organizations operating in Burma. However, she said further aid could be delayed because Burma’s government, one of the world’s most isolationist military regimes, has not yet agreed to allow a U.S. disaster response team into the country.

Maybe the junta in Burma is waiting for marching orders from Beijing first.

Not surprisingly, one of Mugabe’s most important enablers has been the government of the People’s Republic of China (PRC). As I reported here last year, not only has Beijing sold Harare some thirty military aircraft, including FC-1 fighter jets and K-8 light attack aircraft, which the latter can ill afford, but it has also provided the ZANU-PF regime with the literal tools of repression, including radio-jamming equipment and listening devices. Mugabe, like his fellow despot, Sudan’s Umar al-Bashir, has come to expect “customer courtesies” from the PRC like the Chinese prevention of UN discussion of his situation last week.

Its not that Beijing had a change of heart about arming the Robert Mugabe regime, but rather because neighboring nations refused to allow the ship to dock so the weapons could be off-loaded and delivered to land-locked Zimbabwe.

Here is my original post on this story, including a section on Mugabe’s torture tactics against his opposition.

According to Reuters:

Chinese Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Jiang Yu said the contract for the shipment was signed last year and was “unrelated to recent developments” in Zimbabwe.

Jiang said the arms shipment was “perfectly normal trade in military goods between China and Zimbabwe,” but because it was impossible for land-locked Zimbabwe to receive the goods, the company may ship the cargo back to China.

Only an authoritarian regime like Communist China would consider arming a murderous thugocracy like Mugabe’s Zimbabwe to be “perfectly normal trade.”

The Central Committee members in Beijing must be furious that the international attention being focused on China’s thuggery in Tibet might be screwing up their arms trade with the other regimes.

Two officials said Washington’s effort to block the ship from unloading its cargo was now concentrated on Namibia and Angola and that both countries were being told that allowing the An Yue Jiang to dock could harm their relations with the United States.

It’s good to see the administration be willing to risk upsetting Beijing over its shady dealings with African thugs like Mugabe, especially considering the U.S. State Department’s shameless kowtowing to Beijing over Taiwan’s efforts at United Nations membership

According to The Guardian’s South Africa correspondent:

A Chinese cargo ship believed to be carrying 77 tonnes of small arms, including more than 3m rounds of ammunition, AK47 assault rifles, mortars and rocket-propelled grenades, has docked in the South African port of Durban for transportation of the weapons to Zimbabwe, the South African government confirmed yesterday. It claimed it was powerless to intervene as long as the ship’s papers were in order.

Copies of the documentation for the Chinese ship, the An Yue Jiang, show that the weapons were sent from Beijing to the ministry of defence in Harare [the capital city of Zimbabwe]. Headed “Dangerous goods description and container packing certificate”, the document was issued on April 1, three days after Zimbabwe’s election. It lists the consignment as including 3.5m rounds of ammunition for AK47 assault rifles and for small arms, 1,500 40mm rockets, 2,500 mortar shells of 60mm and 81mm calibre, as well as 93 cases of mortar tubes.

It might seem amazingly stupid timing on Beijing’s part to be supplying arms to one of Africa’s most atrocious authoritarian regimes only months before the opening of the Olympics in Beijing. But arming, and otherwise propping up African thugocracies is business as usual for Beijing. As The Guardian continues:

Despite international criticism, the Chinese government has been a longstanding backer of Zimbabwe president Robert Mugabe’s authoritarian regime, supplying it with jet fighters, military vehicles and guns. China, or Chinese businesses, are reported to have sold radio-jamming devices to prevent independent stations from contradicting the state-controlled media, and have signed vital agriculture deals.

The Beijing/Mugabe arms story broke at about the same time as a new report by Human Rights Watch on torture camps being set up in Zimbabwe to punish opposition party memebers who voted against Mugabe and his ZANU-PF party in last month’s elections.

According to the April 19 Human Rights Watch report:

During the day, ZANU-PF and their allies (so-called “war veterans,” youth militias and some armed men in military uniform) gather at these camps to decide on their targets, generally those known or thought to support the Movement for Democratic Change (MDC). According to witnesses, the targets are then rounded up and brought to the camps at night, where they are beaten for hours with thick wooden sticks and army batons. Human Rights Watch has interviewed more than 30 people in the last two days who have sustained serious injuries, including broken limbs, as a result of these beatings.

Zimbabwe’s parliamentary elections on March 29, 2008 delivered a decisive defeat for the ruling ZANU-PF led by Robert Mugabe. Yet, nearly three weeks later, the ZANU-PF-appointed Election Commission has failed to announce the results of the presidential poll that took place at the same time.

ZANU-PF officials are calling the crackdown Operation Makavhoterapapi, or “Where did you put your cross?” There seem to be two aims to this organized violence: to punish people for having voted for the MDC and to intimidate them to vote for ZANU-PF if there is a presidential run-off. One victim told Human Rights Watch: “They told me that next time you will vote wisely, now you know what we can do.”

If there is a run-off election in Zimbabwe, maybe next instead of wooden sticks and batons, Mugabe’s thugs will be using Chinese-made AK-47s.